Doctor Who, The Almost People

The Doctor and his ganger.

The Doctor and his 'ganger'.

This is part two to the story that began with ‘The Rebel Flesh’ last week. Apparently it’s also the penultimate episode – before the midseries break, that is. I had no idea there was going to be such a thing, and I must confess agreement with the rest of my twitterfeed that’s it’s a bizarre and probably mistaken choice. At a time when TV is largely so barren, I’ve been treasuring my weekly Doctor Who fix. Alas, it feels as though that’s about all I agree with the rest of the Internet on.

It’s been a weird half-season. I quite liked ‘The Curse of the Black Spot’ whilst it was otherwise generally reviled for making no sense. I enjoyed ‘The Doctor’s Wife’ but was utterly perplexed by the frequent assertions that it was the Best Episode Ever. And I thoroughly enjoyed this episode, feeling that it brought home a lot of promises and really upped the series’ game, where virtually everyone else seems to feel that it left too many unanswered questions. Lots of people have said that they are ‘losing their patience’ and that they feel Doctor Who will lose its casual watchers if it doesn’t resolve its plot soon.

I completely disagree. For years I, and others, have been lamenting the episodic structure of New Who. Where Old Who had story arcs that typically lasted between four and seven episodes, in New Who you were lucky if you got a two-parter. Whilst I’m not generally a fan of mid-season breaks, a seven part story actually feels like a perfectly natural thing for Doctor Who to do. Moreover, where Pertwee-style seven episode arcs could feel a bit long, the new version has incorporated self-contained plots that could be enjoyed perfectly independently of having to understand what the brief, unobtrusive flashes of something that Amy sees were about. To me, it feels like a nice balance, and I approve. Perhaps the negative reaction is just a natural resistance to change? I don’t know, it’s not my reaction, so it’s difficult to analyse.

As for the episode itself, it gave everything that ‘The Rebel Flesh’ promised but failed to deliver. Possibly a lot is owed to Matt Smith’s effortless charm as he swiftly confirms himself as one of my favourite Doctors. Where the general ‘ganger’ (doppelgänger) plots were predictable and uninteresting, the introduction of a ganger for the Doctor was utterly delightful. Smith clearly had a lot of fun with the role and it was a joy to watch. I’ve mentioned before that I enjoy doppelgänger as a concept. One of the joys for me of the Peter Davison era is that they employ this idea on four separate occasions in delightfully different ways (Kamelion, Omega, the Dalek duplicates, and Jek’s androids). But for all my Peter Davison love, the 45min format, the wonderful script, and Matt Smith’s acting left all of those behind.

I also enjoyed the subplot with the ganger of the guy who was a father. It was a really lovely, thoughtful touch. It was beautifully and believably played out in a gracefully understated manner. Mark Bonnar is to be commended. It’s also nice to see such a touching relationship with a father and son. If this plot had been envisioned 20 years ago, I am absolutely convinced that it would have been one of the women it went to – it would have been assumed that the women had families, and that their families would be more important to them than any concerns about the ongoing situation. In complementary fashion, Raquel Cassidy* is awesome as Cleaves, the strong female leader whose control issues can lead her to jump into a situation without thinking it through, and yet whose strength and self-confidence make her believably the one who would quickly affirm control of a situation and persuade others to follow her even if they weren’t sure she was right. I equally liked that the power struggle in this episode was between two women of opposing views… and that that power dynamic stays the same even after the positions of the two women have changed. Most of all, I love that all this is going on and no one once comments on the gender dynamics of the situation. It’s interesting for us watching a 21st Century TV program; for them, it’s just a part of life.

Perhaps the most shocking and problematic aspects of the episode occur towards the end, so please take this as a spoiler warning, because I can’t discuss them without giving some pretty big things away. What I’m talking about is the fact that Amy turns out to be a ganger, and the Doctor kills her in order to free the consciousness of the real Amy so that she can concentrate on her labour. This is the resolution of the pregnancy plot. It turns out that, having realised that he was getting mixed readings on Amy because her consciousness was that of a person who was pregnant whilst the body she was in was not, the Doctor visited a time when the ‘flesh’ (the stuff the gangers are made from) is being used so that he can analyse it and work out how to dissolve it. It just so happens that at the time of arrival a solar ‘tsunami’ causes the flesh to become self-aware and self-assertive.

What seems odd is that the whole of the last two episodes has been focused on a discussion of the rights the gangers have to be treated as real people. Having worked so hard to persuade Amy that his own ganger is real, he then destroys hers very casually – surely something is wrong? I was a bit shocked by this at the time, but, on reflection, it’s not as bad as it initially seems. First off: Amy was shielded from the solar tsunami by the TARDIS. Her flesh never became self-aware, it was just a vehicle for Amy’s consciousness. Moreover, the Doctor and his ganger make a point of the fact that the memories of gangers seem to survive the disolution of the flesh, so the ganger-Doctor may yet survive to take the Doctor’s place at his ‘death’. The fact that Amy’s ganger disolves may not be the ending of its life, merely its possession by Amy.

However, I doubt they’re going to start the next episode with the ganger as a new character on board the TARDIS, so I concede that that’s less likely. I think it makes more sense to regard this ganger as not self-aware. The Doctor clearly isn’t happy about having to dissolve it, but it’s not the same as killing a fully sentient being in order to save his friend. It is still a strange and grim use to put the sonic screwdriver to, but an understandable one, and I would argue and interesting rather than ‘unacceptable’ one.

Granted, it would have been nice to have some kind of explanation in the episode itself, but I don’t really think there was time. It would have destroyed the dramatic tension, and we are going to pick up the next episode exactly where we left off. Overall, I think fears that not enough questions are being answered this series are ungrounded. Personally, I think Matthew Graham is to be commended for creating a really cracking, interesting watch.

‘Would you like a jelly baby…?’

*Side note: in looking this up, I came to learn that Cassidy comes from the same town I grew up in. I did not expect to be reminded of that place this morning. Good on her for going on to more interesting things.

About Serenity Womble

I'm a writer of science fiction and fantasy short stories, as well as many, many unfinished novels. I review things of a generally speculative nature. This is my blog for writing and reviewing.
This entry was posted in Doctor Who, Review. Bookmark the permalink.

9 Responses to Doctor Who, The Almost People

  1. john besa uh uh yes says:

    i know all the spoliers

  2. Nyssa23 says:

    OMG that jellybaby thing about killed me. J and I went back to that scene twice to hear it again. I must say though that I’m rather hoping the ganger Doctor is sacrificing himself rather than the original because I don’t want the regenerations to stop at 11! 😉

    As you know, I’m the mother of a 5-year-old son (who also does a silly little dance when he’s excited), and I literally broke down in tears when the holo-call came.

    I have to say that I hate the mid-season break too and I know I am going to be quite sad to not have weekly Who ALL SUMMER. 😦 Although I am wondering if Amy is going to be mad at Rory for not somehow knowing he wasn’t with the real Amy? That could be fun and cringey all at the same time.

    • I had been wondering if that was how they were going to do it even before Amy voiced the possibility. *Fingers crossed!*

      That little boy was so adorable! I’m glad he gets to have some form of Daddy, although I hope the ganger dude has some kind of discussion with his wife about it.

      I will miss it being gone all summer… but I imagine I will enjoy having it in the Autumn. Plusses and minuses I guess.

      Think Rory can’t be blamed for not guessing – after all, it was really Amy’s consciousness, and Amy didn’t know herself 😀

  3. Anne Lyle says:

    I too was a bit concerned by the Doctor’s destruction of Amy’s ganger. I hope that the apparent reversal of the episode’s moral message is at least touched on in the next story – if the producers do want the show to carry a message, they need to point out apparent inconsistencies to the younger members of the audience who may not otherwise understand. Just a “Rory: Why did you destroy her? Doctor: She wasn’t self-aware like the others”-type exchange would be enough, I think.

    However her destruction does make sense, once you make this distinction. If the ganger was merely a vehicle, I can understand that the Doctor would want Amy to be conscious for her real body’s labour, rather than experiencing it through a non-pregnant ganger (which would just be weird, as well as very distressing for her). Destroying the ganger is the only humane thing to do, once she goes into labour.

    On the other hand, unless I missed something there seems to be a lot of hand-waving around the subject of the gangers’ sentience. Amy-ganger was on the island when the second solar tsunami wave struck, so why wasn’t she made sentient like the others?

    Mostly, though, I have to try and turn off my brain when watching Who, because a lot of it doesn’t make sense if you look at it too hard. Like people still watching reality TV shows twenty thousand years in the future. It makes my alternate-history-writing self go all wibbly-wobbly-timey-wimey just to think about it…

    • Yes, I think as long as there’s a brief exchange between Rory and the Doctor, it’ll be OK. Rory’s presumably got to have a lot of questions!

      There was a second solar tsunami? I didn’t notice that! On the otherhand, the Doctor also comments that the flesh on the island is much earlier technology. Possibly they just solved the issue of sentience altogether? (Although that has rather grim implications.)

      What I want from Who is internal consistency and non-violation of things that would be genuinely misleading for children concerning science that matters to their lives. On the whole, Who does fairly well at not violating that. On the other hand, I agree with you on the twenty thousand years thing. In general, I was pissed off with RTD for just going ‘let’s add an obscene number of years, just for kiks!’. Not least because it often contradicted Old Who plot in an unnecessary manner. Here, on the other hand, the worrying thing is for the Doctor’s morality, rather than the science. Dissolving a non-sentient being is one thing, but one we just spent two episodes discussing the morality of would be another.

      But yeah: over all, I just want them to make a satisfying handwave.

      • Anne Lyle says:

        Re the tsunami, there was the first wave that they rode in on, then the second wave that the Doctor warned the factory team was on its way. It was the second one that seems to have Frankensteined the gangers. But you’re right – Amy-ganger was later technology and maybe not sensitive to flares in the same way.

        • Ahhh – I was possibly not paying as much attention in the first part. Perhaps it took two flashes, anyway…

          • Anne Lyle says:

            But the Doctor-ganger didn’t exist during the first wave. I think that Amy being more advanced technology is the only sane explanation 🙂

            • Hmm, good point, but there’s no evidence that he had a consciousness distinct from the Doctor’s – he was *just* like the Doctor. Suspect teeh advanced tech had something to do with it. However, on rewatching I noticed that the Doctor says he’ll be as humane as possible based on what they’ve learned… sounds like he does regard it as a killing in some sense. It’s interesting!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s